The Seeker desires a robust, rapid, and accurate method to determine an individual’s age using DNA from a variety of biological specimens. The method must significantly improve upon existing techniques in the areas of accuracy, speed, and ease of use. The Seeker envisions that advances in next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics will lead to the development of novel methods to determine age from DNA taken from all cell types.
This Challenge requires only a written proposal.
Current methodologies for determining age from DNA samples suffer from several shortcomings related to accuracy, speed, and ease of use. With the advent of new technologies such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) and bioinformatics, it is expected that novel, more accurate, more rapid and less cumbersome methods to determine an individual’s age from DNA from all cell types will be developed. The Seeker is looking for a robust, rapid, and accurate method to determine age using DNA taken from a variety of biological tissue and/or fluid sources. The method should use a low amount of DNA (<10 ng), be easy to perform, and be accurate to within ±5 years. In addition, the Seeker requests recommendations for datasets to be used for validation of the proposed method.
This is a Theoretical Challenge that requires only a written proposal to be submitted. The Challenge award will be contingent upon theoretical evaluation of the proposal by the Seeker.
To receive an award, the Solvers will not have to transfer their exclusive IP rights to the Seeker. Instead, they will grant to the Seeker non-exclusive license to practice their solutions.
What is a Theoretical-Licensing Challenge?
An InnoCentive Theoretical Challenge builds upon an idea but is not yet a proof of concept. A solution to a Theoretical Challenge will solidify the Solver's concept with detailed descriptions, specifications and requirements necessary to bringing a good idea closer to becoming an actual product or service.
This Challenge is a Theoretical-Licensing Challenge, meaning that the Seeker is requesting non-exclusive rights to use the winning solution. By contrast, Theoretical-IP Transfer means that Solvers must relinquish all rights to the Intellectual Property (IP) for which they are awarded. For these forms of a Theoretical Challenge, Solvers that do not win retain the rights to their solution after the evaluation period is complete. The Seeker retains no rights to any IP not awarded.